Barbara Lee
LATEST NEWS
Iraq
Colombia
The Philippines
North Korea
France
NEWS LINKS
NewsDissector
tomdispatch
AlterNet.org
Big, Left, Outside
Black Commentator
BuzzFlash
Tom Paine.common sense
Common Dreams
The Daily Mis-Lead
Google News
http://www.indymedia.org/
indymedia.org
Information Clearing House
In These Times
MotherJones
The Nation
Politech
The Progressive
portland.indymedia.org
pulpnonfiction.blogspot
rationalmind.net
Rolling Stone Magazine
Salon.com
ScoopMedia.NZ
TruthOut
Wired
Working for Change
Zmag
MediaChannel.org
WORLD WIRES
IRNA
REUTERS
ALTERNATIVE
to Right Wing Media: LIVE!
10:00 pm to 1:00 am Monday-Friday
The Sunshine Tony Wong Show, featuring Uncle Bernie Ward aka
the Lion of the Left!
Then hear Ray Taliaferro and Operation American Freedom
from 1:00 to 5:00 am Pacific Time.
 KGO - San Francisco
 
ACTION ITEM
Wal-Mart Liberation Front
GEEZE LINKS
911 Preparation
9/11 Timeline
911review.org
America Coming Together
Black Box - Diebold
bringthemhomenow.org
Center for American Progress
Center for Public Integrity
Council on American-Islamic Relations
Common Cause
costofwar.com
conspiracy-theory-news
democracymeansyou.com
FBI Cover-Up
Global Public Media
Globalization Research
Gold Anti-Trust Action
Government Information Awareness
Guerrilla News Network
Gulf War Vets
Hermes Press
Iraq War Casualties
Cynthia McKinney
Online Journal
Peak Oil & Gas Study
Re-Call Bush
Michael Ruppert
Danny Schechter
SeptemberEleventh.org
Stop Bush in 2004
TIKKUN
Un-answered Questions
VERPA.org - Vets
votetoimpeach.org
Watley Review
Where is the Money?
|
"There is no way to commercialize giving thanks." -- Bernie Ward
"Life in the USA is a whole lot less fun than it used to be..."
Don Hazen - AlterNet
23JAN2004
The Blood-sweetened Beverage
TGIF - Have a good weekend!
WARNING
VIRUS ALERT :
Keep your eyes open for a
new virus: The "Bagle" or "Beagle" worm, arriving in an e-mail with the subject "hi" and the
word "test" in the message body. If the accompanying attachment is executed, the worm is unleashed and
tries to send itself to all e-mails listed in the user's address book. The virus only affects machines
running Microsoft Windows operating systems. [MORE INFO]
Ed. note: Workers of the world, unite! is a far cry from the International
havoc foisted upon us via the corporate "globalization" vampires.
From our friend Tom Engelhardt (tomdispatch.com), we received
History to the rescue, an introduction to Against All Odds by Adam Hochschild.
The Hochschild piece gives us a little history about institutional slavery as the largest "empire" on
earth, and I am ashamed to say that until I read it as a tomdispatch, I was unaware of how the
movement to dismantle the "empire" began. The story is a lesson we should learn and never forget.
Using Hochschild's own words, the application of these methods of the movement might also promise the
means to an end of poverty, and the vast gap between rich and poor nations.
The environmental catastrophe facing the whole wide world, which manifests as global warming, and the
poisoning of the earth's soil, air, and water could be harnessed and reversed using the same
abolitionist tactics as ended slavery.
Putting an end to the relentless threat of nuclear, chemical and biological Weapons of Mass Destruction could
also be brought about in the same way slavery was abolished - indeed "the habit of war" could be phased
out in the spirit and lifetimes of "my children shall be free!"
Adam Hochschild writes: "For more than two decades before the Civil War, the holiday celebrated most
fervently by free blacks in the American North was not July 4 (when they were at risk of attack from
drunken white mobs) but August 1, Emancipation Day in the British Empire."
"Uprisings of the oppressed have erupted throughout history, but the anti-slavery movement in England
was the first sustained mass campaign anywhere on behalf of someone else's rights."
Adam introduces us to Clarkson, an accidental character in human history who un-did in a mere fifty-two
years, the institution of slavery and the slave-trade that had been officially in place throughout
the British Empire for 276 years.
Adam starts the story out at the beginning in 1787, when a 25-year-old divinity student
named Thomas Clarkson entered a Latin-writing contest.
The subject was slavery. In researching the
story, he became compulsively interested enough to have made ending institutional slavery his life
work. His essay was the winning entry, and afterwards he and a dozen friends got the essay published
in English, and the British anti-slavery movement was born.
From a Clarkson diary:
"Within a few years, another tactic [of chipping away at the slave-trade] arose from the grassroots.
Throughout the length and breadth of the British Isles, people stopped eating the major product
harvested by British slaves: sugar."
Hochschild writes: "Clarkson was delighted to find a "remedy, which the people were taking into
their own hands.... Rich and poor, churchmen and dissenters.... By the best computation I was able
to make from notes taken down in my journey, no fewer than three hundred thousand persons had
abandoned the use of sugar."
Almost like "fair trade" food labeling today, advertisements quickly filled the
press: "BENJAMIN TRAVERS, Sugar-Refiner, acquaints the Publick that he has now an assortment of
Loaves, Lumps, Powder Sugar, and Syrup, ready for sale... produced by the labour of FREEMEN."
Then, as now, the full workings of a globalized economy were largely invisible. The boycott caught
people's imagination because it brought these hidden ties to light. The poet Robert Southey spoke of
tea as "the blood-sweetened beverage."
Although Clarkson was the only one of the original group to see it happen, on July 31st, 1838,
slavery in the largest empire on earth officially ended.
Tom Engelhardt gives us a fitting introduction to Adam Hochschild's piece:
History and hope. They don't always seem like the perfect couple, but just when you think it's
hopeless, along comes Adam Hochschild to remind us that even the most embedded of institutions can, in
fact, be uprooted in little more than a long lifetime. The use of the car, the burning of fossil fuels,
the making of war, the arrogance of empire -- few institutions or ways of life were more "human," more
essential to our nature, than slavery. In the piece that follows, Adam Hochschild takes us back to the
first great human-rights campaign in history -- the movement to end slavery in the British Empire. The
men who began it were considered kooks. It had no business succeeding. Yet its legacy and its
extraordinary achievements live on (including the pioneering of most of the everyday tools any movement
for change would automatically use today, from the political poster to the direct-mail fundraising
letter and the media campaign). Hochschild, author of King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror,
and Heroism in Colonial Africa, gives us a peek below into his many-years-in-preparation history of the
British anti-slavery movement, which will be published next fall. In his hands, history offers us all
unexpected hope. Mother Jones magazine published this piece in its January-February issue and it is
thanks to their kind permission that I can release it on the web. Tom
Against All Odds
By ADAM HOCHSCHILD
Strangely, in a city where it seems that on every block a blue-and-white glazed plaque commemorates a
famous event or resident, none marks this spot. All you can see today, after you leave the Bank station
of the London underground, walk a block or two east, and then take a few steps into a courtyard, is a
couple of low, nondescript office buildings, an ancient pub, and, on the site itself, 2 George Yard, a
glass-and-steel high-rise. Nothing remains of the bookstore and printing shop that once stood here, or
recalls the late afternoon in 1787 when a dozen people - a somber-looking crew, one man in clerical black
and most of the others not removing their high-crowned blade hats-filed through its doors and sat down
to launch one of the most far-reaching citizens' movements of all time. Cities build monuments to kings
and generals, not to people who once gathered in a bookstore. And yet what these particular citizens did
was felt across the world-winning the admiration of the first and greatest student of what today we
call civil society. What they accomplished, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote, was "something absolutely
without precedent in history... If you pore over the histories of all peoples, I doubt that you will
find anything more extraordinary."
To fully grasp how momentous was what began at 2 George Yard, picture the world as it existed in 1787.
Well over three-quarters of the people on earth are in bondage of one land or another. In parts of the
Americas, slaves far outnumber free people. African slaves are also scattered widely through much of
the Islamic world. Slavery is routine in most of Africa itself. In India and other parts of Asia, some
people are outright slaves, others in debt bondage that ties them to a particular landlord as harshly as
any slave to a Southern plantation owner. In Russia the majority of the population are serfs. Nowhere is
slavery more firmly rooted than in Britain's overseas empire, where some half-million slaves are being
systematically worked to an early death growing West Indian sugar. Caribbean slave-plantation fortunes
underlie many a powerful dynasty, from the ancestors of Elizabeth Barrett Browning to the family of the
fabulously wealthy William Beckford, lord mayor of London, who hired Mozart to give his son piano
lessons. One of the most prosperous sugar plantations on Barbados is owned by the Church of England.
Furthermore, Britain's ships dominate the slave trade, delivering tens of thousands of chained captives
each year to French, Dutch, Spanish, and Portuguese colonies as well as to its own.
If you had proposed, in the London of early 1787, to change all of this, nine out often people would
have laughed you off as a crackpot. The 10th might have admitted that slavery was unpleasant but said
that to end it would wreck the British Empire's economy. It would be as if, today, you maintained that
the automobile must go. One in ten listeners might agree that the world would be better off if we
traveled instead by foot, bicycle, electric train, or trolley, but are you suggesting a political
movement to ban cars? Come on, be serious! Looking back, however, what is even more surprising than
slavery's scope is how swiftly it died. By the end of the 19th century, slavery was, at least on paper,
outlawed almost everywhere. Every American schoolchild learns about the Underground Railroad and the
Emancipation Proclamation. But our self-centered textbooks often skip over the fact that in the
superpower of the time slavery ended a full quarter-century earlier. For more than two decades before
the Civil War, the holiday celebrated most fervently by free blacks in the American North was not July
4 (when they were at risk of attack from drunken white mobs) but August 1, Emancipation Day in the
British Empire.
Jettisoning "Cargo"
On March 18, 1783, the Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser carried a short letter to the editor
about a case being heard in a London courtroom. The item caught the eye of a former slave living in
England, Olaudah Equiano. Horrified, he ran immediately to see an Englishman he knew, Granville Sharp,
an eccentric pamphleteer and known opponent of slavery. Sharp recorded in his diary that Equiano "called
on me, with an account of one hundred and thirty Negroes being thrown alive into the sea." [MORE]
ON/OFF SUBJECT: There was a chap interviewd on the radio the other night who is the
spokesman or administrator of a school in Israel for Israeli and Palestinian students. You can imagine
what a profound learning experience it must be for the children; to get a first class education, and to
be exposed to each others' culture in the process.
Back to the technicality of matters. In the interview, the interviewee, an Israeli, referred to Muslims
as Moslems (pronounced "moz-lums").
A moslem is a cruel individual - the exact opposite from a Muslim; a man of peace. In Arabic,
presumably spoken by Palestinian students in their Two States Solution experimental school, "zulm" is
understood to mean harm or evil.
While I hope their two-state solution works out, but which I have no faith in, how can the well
educated youth expect to really have it right if their teachers, even through ignorance of Islam
and/or the Arabic language project and perpetuate the very kind of disrespect of Muslims to their
Israeli students, and insult their Muslim students by referring to Muslims as Moslems?
Hereabouts, we might hear niggrah (in place of negro) and really meaning nigger. What? Ignorance or
just a subtle and hurtful way of perpetuating the status quo? Speaking of moslems and Muslims...
Adam Hochschild's piece re: the "Islamic" world, which might better
be described as the "Muslim" world because technically, slavery in the "Islamic" and the Qur'anic world
is also being phased out. Nominals (in name only "Muslims") are still in the process of catching up with
the (Islamic) times.
During the Prophet's time, and before the Recital (which became Al-Qur'an), when nearly all men were
enslaved to some degree or other, he arranged for five breaks a day, and during Ramadan (the month of
fasting), a slave owner could forgo the fast in exchange for the freeing of a slave; that was 30 slaves
freed per non-fasting slave owner per year, technically, every 11 months.
In Words must be credible by
Tom Engelhardt, from the SOU transcript quotes Bush as
saying, "No one can now doubt the word of America". There was another quote from the transcript that got
my attention, on the insulting "Libyan offer to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction". My take: As
it is a CIA op, it will continue to go terribly wrong. See
Overplaying our hand in Iraq by Robert Jailall - "The only remaining reason for the U.S. military to
stay in Iraq is to prevent civil war." Waitaminute! What about the oil? Qadaffi who?
I wrote two things recently that got my attention re: that Slate "outing" I mentioned some days ago -
about defining "infidel", and an expression of peace until written not having ever been said out loud,
or written anywhere, except in Sufi everyday - I mentioned it to my wife, since we live surrounded by
trees, "Did you notice the forest in the trees taking up our whole life with air we breathe?" in so many
words
On the infidel first, in response to
Paul Berman specifically, and the Slate piece Liberal Hawks Reconsider the Iraq War generally:
Religion is of secondary concern, and that is a problem to Muslims that hold little regard for those
who don't put their respective religion first. The west considers their oil first, and their religion
second, if at all. That is the almost classic definition of the so-hated infidel.
Also, gratitude, and...
On the conceptual peace v. the conceptual fear, the fear (referred to in Words must be credible,
is real. So is the peace!
Did Usama bin Laden
mis-use the Sayyid Qutb writings (that Paul Berman introduced me to)? What would happen if Sayyid Qutb's writings were
properly interpreted and applied? It doesn't take much brain power to imagine what would be the
opposite effect of 9/11 in Islam, and in New York and at the Pentagon.
"You simply can't write such words so many times over and in such variety without conscious intent." -- Tom Englehardt
"nee-yah", in Arabic is "intent", which in Islamic study is a big deal.
Those guys over at the Bush White House are writing spells. But then, so are we. Who's majickq works?
...in the context of the Moon Over Morocco radio serial from quite a few years ago, and the
boxed-tapes version heard more recently
ago.
Still I haven't received a copy of Absolute Friends by John Le Carre, which the more I hear about it
the more excited I am to read where he is taking us to this time.
Anyhow, she said she noticed, now that I'd mentioned what we mostly take for granted in so many words
Besides experiential (gratitude) peace, this is what the Sayyid Qutb writings were about,
and specifically what he meant when he said, "every person might be free from servitude to others."
It's a struggle (jihad).
Spalding Gray * Latest News
The Chinese New Year (of the Wood Monkey) is under way. If you want more information, click
onto
Shelly Wu's site. If you want to find your birth year sign, click
HERE for a calculator. Happy New Year!
The next betrayal? The Kurds and their "friends"
By AYUB NURI
Iraqi Kurds have struggled for self-determination for eighty years. Iraq can have no peace -
and the United States will lose its only true friend in the Middle East - if their rights are again
denied.
You will hardly find a single Iraqi Kurd who is not happy with the fall of Saddam's regime and his
capture in December 2003. Yet the struggle we Kurds have waged in the last thirty years was not against
Saddam Hussein alone, but against a regime that was denying our democratic rights as Kurds, at the same
time as trying to exterminate us.
Indeed, this struggle stretches back even farther than thirty years - to the period after the first
world war, when much of Kurdistan was attached to Iraq by the British colonial authorities against the
will of the Kurds themselves. The British, guided by their interests in the region's oil, broke their
promises of Kurdish independence, throwing the Kurds on the mercy of Arab nationalists (as well as
Turks and Persians) without any compunction.
The Kurds were left with the hard task of fighting alone for their rights. For the last eighty years,
we have sacrificed plenty of lives to this struggle. In Iraq, this has meant resisting successive
regimes in Baghdad. Throughout, we have tried to take our story to the outside world, detailing all the
crimes committed against us by those regimes. No country in the world was willing to acknowledge what
was happening to us in Kurdistan: the United States included. Only the fragile autonomy secured after
the United States-led war of 1991 gave us a temporary breathing-space.
Arabs and Kurds: worlds apart
So many betrayals and rebuffs of our cause by the outside world did not, however, prevent the same
Kurds from becoming the major, real ally of the United States in its war against Saddam's regime in
2003. For us, this was another opportunity to achieve our aims and put an end to an especially cruel
regime that had killed us systematically for three decades.
We did not forget that this meant entering into an alliance with the same America and Britain that
had helped unleash Saddam on Iraq against the Iraqi people and their neighbours in the first place. It
was, after all, the same Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld and their associates who had turned a blind eye
to the chemical gas attack on the Kurds in Halabja in 1988, who now visited it in 2003 as the scene of
a war crime.
But with the overthrow of Saddam's regime, Iraqi Kurds hoped that finally we were within sight of
guaranteed autonomy and stable relationships with their neighbours. But now that America has made itself
master of Iraq's destiny, it seems strangely unwilling to listen to Kurdish aspirations. Now that
the 'Iraqi freedom' mission is accomplished, America has begun to argue that the fate of the Kurdish
people lies in the hands of the Iraqi authorities and the Iraqi people. Forgotten are all the promises
made to the Kurds, and the debt owed them. This latest setback is a huge disappointment to the Kurds,
for the majority of the Iraqi population is composed of Arabs - both Sunni and Shi'a Muslims.
Shi'a members of the governing council seem to have promised Kurdish leaders that, after the Shi'a
themselves have gained power in Iraq, they will vote for the type of federalism the Kurds favour.
The Sunni community of Iraq, by contrast, sees such a federalist arrangement as the theft of part of
their country, and a blow against their national feeling. But neither group seems likely to get what
they want.
If the Shi'a majority ran Iraq, they would have to dance to the tune of their long-term supporter and
co-religionist Iran, with its own millions of Kurds whose rights are similarly denied. So our Kurdish
leaders must be very careful indeed to avoid being deceived yet again by current promises, from any
source.
Kurdish members of the Iraqi governing council have a historical responsibility to future generations of
Kurds, who must not be asked to pay a heavy price for their weakness today. The world should realise
that Kurds and Arabs are completely different peoples. Kurdistan and its Kurds existed for centuries
before Iraq came into being as a country. On no account can Kurdish demands be equated with Shi'a or
other Arab demands. We Iraqi Kurds are self-sufficient and deserve to be treated in distinction from
the other parts of Iraq.
Americans and Kurds: the price of partnership
The Sunni and Shi'a Arabs in central and southern parts of Iraq share a common language, history and
culture. In addition there is a real prospect that a shared sense of belonging to the nation will make
them willing to stay together in one Iraq. But what could such an Iraq offer us? Could we expect its
Arab leaders to be either familiar with or loyal to Kurdish concerns? The Arabs of Iraq have always
looked to the Arab League and the tribal system to solve all their problems as well as their day-to-day
and national disputes. By contrast, we Kurds hanker for modernity and make every effort to keep abreast
of international developments. Long ago, we put the tribal system that the Arabs still abide by, behind
us.
The time, then, is long overdue for the United States and the Arabs to recognise the Kurdish demand for
self-rule, otherwise Iraq will continue to suffer the same problems of insurgency that confronted
Saddam's regime and previous regimes. In return, we are quite explicit in saying that we will provide
America with all the oil, security, support for the 'war against terror' and so-called democracy that it
wants, if it will only grant us independence, or the kind of federalism that we can live with.
In recognising such a demand, the United States would do well not to rely on those Kurdish leaders who
are members of the governing council as fully representative of the Kurdish case. Alongside their
struggles in the Kurdish cause, these guys have their own ambitions to pursue. It is the Kurdish people
as a whole who have to be listened to and given the space they need to run their own affairs.
Meanwhile it is perfectly obvious that America has never fully trusted the Arabs, nor the Arabs America.
America might have won over certain Arab leaders to their agenda, but not the ordinary Arab peoples.
Kurdish leaders and people alike, however, are well-disposed towards America and American interests.
This has not always been an easy stance to maintain in the face of those Arabs who see our alliance with
America as the betrayal of a Muslim nation. But it remains the case.
The United States is now talking about transferring authority to the Iraqi government as early as June
2004. So before the US leaves the country, it must give the green light to the Iraqi government to grant
the Kurds the right of self-determination. Only this will be sufficient reward for our long struggle,
the crimes perpetrated against us, and our support for United States efforts to overthrow Saddam's
regime. If this does not happen, the Iraqi government the US leaves behind will face huge unrest.
And America itself will lose the one, true friend it has in the Middle East. [MORE]
Beware of Darkness
 
|
Empty Bed Blues - Wal-Mart Again
By ARIANNA HUFFINGTON - Working for Change
Bush leaves no bride behind
State of the Union throws marriage sop to conservative base
Signaling that the Pander Countdown to Election Day 2004 has begun in earnest, President Bush spiced up Tuesday's State of the Union speech by tossing a bone, if not a garter belt and a bible, to his conservative base, which is up in arms over the thought that gay people may soon have the right to legally tie and untie the knot -- and thus make a mockery of the sacred institution that Britney and Jason are such big fans of. He did this by tiptoeing up to the edge of saying "I do" to supporting a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the exclusive province of heterosexual couples.
"Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage," he declared to ringing applause from Tom DeLay and the "Amen" chorus on the right.
The president's connubial rhetoric came on the heels of last week's White House announcement of the "Healthy Marriage" initiative aka "The Leave No Bride Behind Act". The president plans to spend $1.5 billion protecting and promoting marriage, especially among poor, minority couples.
The money will be used to teach couples how to manage their conflicts in healthy ways, and, yes, to fund ad campaigns publicizing the value of getting hitched. I can just picture the PSAs starring Trista and Ryan: "Hey, kids, we were paid millions of dollars to tie the knot on national TV. So don't believe anyone who tells you that marriage isn't worth the trouble!" Federal dollars will also be earmarked for mentoring programs that use married couples as role models. Here's a suggestion: why not start with conservative icons such as Bob Dole, Newt Gingrich and Phil Gramm. They can all tearfully testify how much those ads might have meant in their own unsuccessful attempts to keep a marriage together.
Now I'm not saying that helping married couples stay together is a bad thing. I'm just saying that it's not a job for the Federal government. At least not a government that is faced with far more pressing problems than what to do when he wants to watch football and she wants to cuddle. We have 9% unemployment, 12 million uninsured children, record-breaking $500 billion deficits, unfinished business in Afghanistan and Iraq, porous ports and vulnerable airports, and every state in the union cutting back on vital social programs, and the president wants to spend precious resources convincing young people that marriage is better than shacking up? Just whom is he protecting here? Aside from his own electoral backside.
"Marriage programs do work," insisted Dr. Wade Horn, assistant secretary for children and families of the Department of Health and Human Services. "On average, children raised by their own parents in healthy, stable married families enjoy better physical and mental health and are less likely to be poor." Yeah, well so are children who can read. And those raised by parents who have a job. Or health insurance. Or access to a decent education.
What makes the president's proposal particularly galling is that it's being offered up by a politician who came into office attacking federal programs like the one he is proposing for being too intrusive. "I trust people," said candidate Bush during one of his debates with Al Gore. "I don't trust the federal government."
Indeed, the very people who have been complaining for decades that government programs are not the way to fight the war on poverty are now determined to use Federal tax dollars to fight the war for matrimonial bliss. And they're using the same line of argument they excoriate liberals for using to explain why we need to invest in education, health care, and poverty fighting: "For every $1,000 we spend on public programs addressing family breakdown," said Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, "we only spend one dollar trying to prevent that breakdown in the first place. The President's initiative puts the emphasis in the right place -- prevention."
Of course, these "family values" types, who insist that "marriage is between a man and a woman", uniformly fail to mention that, these days, marriage in America is, quite often, between a man who works eight hours a day in a factory and five hours a night as a security guard and then comes home to an empty bed because his wife is on the night shift, stocking shelves at Wal-Mart. It's pretty damn hard to "manage your conflicts in a healthy way" when the two of you are never in the same room. And for all the talk about how much better off kids in unbroken homes are, there is very little said about how these barely-making-ends-meet parents are supposed to pull off the Ozzie and Harriet routine. Talk to your kids about drugs? When? In the waits at the emergency room, which you're using as your GP because you haven't got health care?
It's time for voters to rethink their relationship with the Commander-in-Chief -- and file for divorce. [MORE]
Arianna Huffington is the author of Pigs at the Trough: How Corporate Greed and Political Corruption Are Undermining America.
Learn More and Get Involved
Act for Change Holiday Boycott Campaign
Wal-Mart vs. Women Advocacy Campaign
Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride Letter-Writing Campaign
'Good Jobs' Material from Wal-Mart
See L.A.Times Three Part Series
An Empire Built on Bargains Remakes the Working World
Scouring the Globe to Give Shoppers an $8.63 Polo Shirt
Grocery Unions Battle to Stop Invasion of the Giant Stores
Also see Wal-Mart is the Machine!
|
The Matrix, and more...
The Matrix - 1999 * The Matrix Reloaded - 2003 * The Matrix Revolutions - 2003 (Pre-publication Order)
The CIA Infiltration of the Left
What next? THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT BEGINS - MoveOn.org
Also see 31DEC2003 Draft Hillary 2004 Update
Click HERE  if you missed yesterday's overnight news.
|
Skin Care and more
LiveJazz
