America, the Dictatorship under George WWIII & Company
LISTEN HERE! and/or TALK TO GUEST
JazzTalk
 THE REAL AXIS OF EVIL?  Taliaferro Think Tank (TTT) and NATIONAL MAD AS HELL DAY. Heard live on KGO 10:00pm - 5:00am M-F Also Sunshine Tony Wong Action Figure - Margot Magowan Team Pussy Links
No group took responsibility for Wednesday night's explosion, the worst terrorist attack in Peru in five years. According to our resident (US) intelligence officials, the bomb was believed to be made of dynamite, ammonium nitrate and fuel oil. Speaking in the Oral office in Washington, George WWIII said: "You know, two-bit terrorists aren't going to prevent me from doing what we need to do, and that is to promote our friendship in the hemisphere." Yeah, George. You tell'em!! 19MAR2002 Carl Worden When Dogs Bite Ladies & gentlemen: The final arguments have been presented, and the jury will now decide whether Marjorie Knoller and her husband, Robert Noel, committed second degree murder and involuntary manslaughter, respectively, in the death of Diane Whipple. Whipple was killed when dogs owned by Knoller and Noel attacked her in the hallway of an apartment in San Francisco on January 26, 2001. Knoller faces 15 years in prison, while her husband faces up to four years. This is one of the most bizarre criminal prosecutions I have ever examined, particularly since the prosecution was unable from the very beginning to prove Knoller ever intended for her dogs to kill Diane Whipple. Robert Noel is being prosecuted for involuntary manslaughter only because he shared ownership of these "dangerous" dogs, and he was not even present when the attack occurred. If a trained and dangerous dog is commanded by the master to attack another person, resulting in that victim's injury or death, then criminal prosecution is certainly called for. In this case it was proven those two dogs had virtually no training whatsoever, and contrary to many erroneous reports, they had never been taught to fight. They were just big 125 pound dogs that for some reason went berserk in that hallway and tore Diane Whipple apart. Nobody knows exactly what triggered the attack, but we do know Marjorie Knoller was physically incapable of pulling off a total of 250 pounds of rage aimed at Diane Whipple once the attack started, and anyone who has ever witnessed a vicious dog attack knows it happens so fast and furious that there is no way to effectively react unless you've got a gun in hand. All we know is that it happened, and that Diane Whipple died a horrible death as a result. But where is the basis for a criminal prosecution in this case? Tragedies such as these have always triggered civil liability on the part of the dogs' owners, but in this case, the San Francisco District Attorney wants to send Marjorie Knoller and Robert Noel to state prison because she and her husband "should have known" their dogs might attack someone at some time in the future. Let's carry this a bit farther. Andrea Yates drowned her five children and has just been sentenced to life in prison in Texas. Her husband knew she was under great stress trying to cope with her children. The family members on both sides knew Andréa had a problem, but everybody now insists they never dreamed she might be a danger to her own children. Since her husband knew she was under such great stress, should Mr. Yates now face trial for second degree murder because he failed to foresee that his wife might harm the children? Should the rest of the family who knew of Andrea Yates' mental instability be subject to prosecution for involuntary manslaughter for not acting, even thought they weren't even there? Here's another one for you: You park on a steep street in San Francisco and forget to curb your wheels. You walk into a restaurant to have dinner, while your several thousand pound vehicle eventually comes loose and careens down the hill, smashing into that nice family of five on their way home from church. The whole family is killed. Should you be charged with five counts of second degree murder because of your failure to do everything absolutely right? According to the logic of the San Francisco District Attorney, damn right you should! You knew that car was capable of injuring or killing another when you bought it! It doesn't matter that you never intended to kill that family; the fact is you did, and now you're going to prison for 15 long years of your life for it. That's where I'm going with this, and it is scary. I was watching Court TV today, listening to the lame final argument of the prosecution in the Knoller-Noel case. In the interim, a poll was taken, and 92% of the respondents thought Knoller and Noel should do hard prison time for owning those two dogs who killed Diane Whipple. That means many of you readers agree with that poll. Well let me tell you something: It is only a matter of time before some of you fail to look the other way, forget to check that lock or leave that gun where someone else can find it. You'll get out of your car, forgetting to put it in park, or you'll be distracted by a cell-phone call. You are going to make mistakes in life that everyone finds regrettable in retrospect, and you may very well be prosecuted criminally and put on trial because you "should have known". Nobody ever knows when dogs are going to bite, and you don't have any way of preventing making your next mistake. Keep that in mind when judging others' screw-ups, for you may very well find yourself in a similar situation that is facing Knoller and Noel, and you will only then fully appreciate the kind of mob-mentality that has taken over our criminal justice system. The next time it could very well be you. Carl F. Worden Ed. note: Carl got a typical reactionary response from one of his militia buddies, in which Carl says the Knoller/Noel case comes down to white racism vs the homosexual community. True story. As Carl says, it never should have gone there but from Day One we first referenced this as a common pre-911 Dog Bites Lesbian story, in case anyone still remembers that on September 10 an investigation of WWIII's theft of Election 2000 was under way. Click on the "next" arrow to read the "Letter from Bob" and Carl's usual cage straightening... 
18MAR2002 The coincidence factor - 87% to 87% not wanting to gloat George WWII has the support of 87% of those polled, we can hardly refewr to them as the electorate since such a small percentage of the eligible American voters actually vote, and of those who do, George WWIII & Company steal the election anyhow. The ordinary Palestinians of their Occupied Land were polled, and 87% would prefer a fight to the death rather than be on bended knee to the Israeli any longer. Since there are more Palestinians than Israeli, the Palestinians will win. Sell your Israel bonds and move to Texas, as in I told you so!! Ed. Note: Info on the W32/Fbound.c@MM bug is available from McAfee.   25JAN2001 Enron makes big money off California energy crisis One of the biggest beneficiaries of the California power crisis is a Texas energy conglomerate that more than any other single company has helped bankroll President Bush's political career. Enron Corporation of Houston is among a handful of a new generation of independent electric power brokers and producers that have reaped giant revenue increases from California's power shortages and higher natural gas prices nationwide. According to the January 2001 AP report. "Right behind Enron in campaign contributions from energy companies was Atlanta based Southern Co., whose Southern Energy subsidiary, recently renamed Mirant, is an electricity supplier in California."  The 21JAN2002 edition of Time features Enron Spoils the Party - Bush wants his State of the Union speech to drown out those stories linking Enron and the White House; an extensive article by Michael Duffy and John Dickerson, with reporting by Cathy Booth Thomas (Dallas), and Karen Tumulty and Michael Weisskopf (Washington).
The smoking gun. Did Duh & Company do Enron's bidding during California's electricity crisis? See: Anthony York Salon.com - 16JAN2002   |
JazzTalk|
 
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
